Paid Media · Service 08
Technical SEO Audit. Microsoft Advertising done seriously. Crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals, schema, internal architecture — examined with surgical rigour, prioritised by commercial impact.
Microsoft Ads is the channel everyone forgets exists.
Wrong. Microsoft owns Bing, Edge, Yahoo, AOL and MSN.
The audience skews older, more affluent, more likely to convert.
The CPCs are 40% lower than Google for the same intent.
Microsoft also owns LinkedIn — meaning their audience signals
include things Google literally cannot match.
Microsoft's search audience is structurally different from Google's. The user base skews older, more affluent, and more professionally engaged — driven by Edge as the default browser on Windows, Microsoft 365 integration, and the LinkedIn-aligned demographic. For B2B brands, premium B2C, and considered-purchase categories, Microsoft Ads consistently produces lower CPCs and higher conversion rates than Google Ads on equivalent queries.
Most agencies dismiss the channel as "too small to matter." That dismissal is wrong on two counts. First, the absolute scale is meaningful — billions of monthly searches across the network. Second, even at smaller scale, the marginal economics are dramatically better than Google for the right brands. We don't recommend Microsoft as a Google replacement; we recommend it as a parallel channel that captures a distinct, valuable audience.
Every audit covers four pillars. Each pillar is a deep dive — not a checklist tick.
Account structure built around Microsoft's specific audience patterns, not lifted from a Google Ads import. LinkedIn audience signals layered into bidding, in-market segments, demographic targeting, and the premium-B2B audience overlays unique to the platform.
Search campaigns engineered for Microsoft's click economics — different keyword strategies than Google (the audience searches slightly differently), modifier discipline, sitelinks and extensions tuned for the platform's display patterns.
Display and native advertising across Microsoft's owned-and-operated properties (MSN, Outlook, Edge new tab) and partner network. Increasingly competitive with Google's Display Network for premium audiences at lower competitive density.
Microsoft Ads UET tag implementation, conversion goal architecture, integration with your CRM, and proper cross-channel attribution alongside Google Ads. The measurement layer that prevents Microsoft's contribution from being double-counted or invisible.
Most engagements start by importing an existing Google Ads structure as a baseline — then immediately adapting it to Microsoft's specific audience and click economics. Direct imports without adaptation typically underperform their Google equivalents.
Microsoft's unique advantage: LinkedIn audience signals (job function, industry, company size) layered onto search and display bidding. The targeting capability Google literally cannot offer.
Microsoft's audience responds differently than Google's — more conservative messaging, more substance, more trust signals. Creative adaptation, not direct replication.
Quarterly review of channel-level economics, audience pool refinement, MAN expansion where commercial. Microsoft compounds steadily for brands that maintain dedicated attention rather than treating it as a Google sidekick.
Two B2B brands run identical Google Ads campaigns at €8 average CPC and 4% conversion rate. One adds Microsoft Ads in parallel; the other doesn't. The Microsoft channel produces an average CPC of €4.80 (40% cheaper) at a 5.5% conversion rate (37% higher). The same monthly budget on Microsoft generates 2.4× the qualified leads of the equivalent Google spend.
The math doesn't work because Microsoft is "better than Google" — Google still has dramatically more search volume. The math works because Microsoft's smaller volume comes with structurally less competitive density, a more affluent audience, and superior B2B targeting via LinkedIn. The right brands run both channels in parallel and capture the marginal economics most competitors don't bother chasing.
A B2B SaaS platform was running €60K monthly Google Ads with no Microsoft Ads presence. The CMO had dismissed Microsoft for years on volume assumptions. We built a parallel Microsoft Ads programme — search campaigns adapted to the platform's audience patterns, LinkedIn audience layering, Microsoft Audience Network expansion — at €15K monthly spend. Nine months in: €480K in incremental qualified pipeline at 35% lower cost per lead than Google.
I'd dismissed Microsoft Ads for a decade on the basis of "Google is bigger." Revolutionize ran the math on what 40% lower CPCs would mean at our actual conversion rates and showed me I'd been leaving money on the table for years. The channel is now 25% of our paid pipeline at 35% better unit economics than Google.
A technical audit is most powerful when followed by these complementary services.
Microsoft and Google work as complementary search channels — same intent capture, different audience economics. Most engagements integrate both into a unified paid search programme.
Explore →Microsoft's LinkedIn audience integration creates natural overlap between the two channels. For B2B brands, Microsoft Ads + LinkedIn Ads run as paired programmes leveraging the same audience signals.
Explore →Microsoft Shopping uses the same product feed as Google Shopping with marginal-cost activation. We typically extend e-commerce programmes from Google to Microsoft once the feed foundation is solid.
Explore →Capture the missed channel
Book a 30-minute scoping call. We'll review your current paid search setup, model the Microsoft Ads opportunity at your specific economics, and quote a possible engagement with no obligation.